Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destinos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Destinos

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

After scouring the Internet, I could find nothing but passing mentions of Destinos in secondary sources— not enough coverage to satisfy GNG. Helen (💬📖) 19:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Helen (💬📖) 19:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Helen (💬📖) 19:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - LA Times feature here: . It was also reviewed in Variety: [Los Angeles Vol. 348, Iss. 5, (Aug 24, 1992): 65]. Other coverage:, Additionally, there is peer reviewed academic research on Destinos on Google Scholar, one example linked here (downloaded PDF): . matt91486 (talk) 21:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 02:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * keepp 52 episodes is not a joke. Loew Galitz (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment with the new sources, might be notable, but the article has zero inline citations. Badly needs a rewrite. Oaktree b (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. I found a lengthy review in the Modesto Bee, and Matt91486's sources provide the program with significant coverage as well. Passes the GNG. The article probably ought to be rewritten from the ground up, granted, but deletion of course is not cleanup. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.