Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny Media Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice as to re-creation more information from reliable sources is found. I can userfy on request. Jujutacular (talk) 16:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Destiny Media Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only coverage is from prnewswire and primary sources, no significant coverage from reliable, secondary sources. No potential redirect targets. – czar   02:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Best case scenario this is WP:TNTSulfurboy (talk) 09:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Does http://javascriptweekly.com/issues/93 coverage of the cringely article qualify as a secondary source? The unique javascript video implementation and the long history in the music industry are the two main notable aspects so I'll continue to source references on those points.  Yes I acknowledge I'm an employee and it's a company article but am committed to improving - it's similar in content and structure to numerous pages from competitors and similar companies. Rick.ramsay (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see a reputation for fact-checking or reliability at that JavaScript newsletter site. Editors with actual conflicts of interest are usually advised to propose edits to the article from another page rather than editing the article directly themselves. – czar   18:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  07:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment additional secondary sources for consideration for notability and future editors:


 * https://books.google.ca/books?id=rMh6fcsRx1sC&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&dq=destiny+media+player+review+1999&source=bl&ots=3n2_ux3yPi&sig=KcnOu2vevIENZvp4FB9_o1kqFR4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CD0Q6AEwBWoVChMIhpaSzbGlxwIVCTmICh0CSgj1#v=onepage&q=destiny%20media%20player%20review%201999&f=false


 * http://radio.about.com/cs/pirateradio/gr/pirateradio.htm
 * https://www.biv.com/article/2011/9/no-flash-in-the-pan/
 * https://www.biv.com/article/2011/6/destiny-media-settles-multi-year-court-battle/
 * http://www.streamingmedia.com/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/The-List-of-the-100-Companies-that-Matter-Most-in-Online-Video-in-2014-99684.aspx


 * Rick.ramsay (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like small blurbs in the national coverage and the biv is local coverage – czar   17:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now and draft & userfy (if needed) as my searches found nothing convincing and good [Destiny Media Technologies here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister   talk  06:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Additional references to the play MPE technology has used within the modern radio industry:
 * http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/country/6648355/kelsea-ballerini-dibs
 * http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/country/6663192/waterloo-revival-gets-a-good-workout-with-bad-for-you
 * http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/country/6633599/country-singer-cam-dreams-up-a-smoldering-ballad-with-burning-house
 * There's a regular stream of these from prominent artists that helps establish the notability of the product - see https://www.google.ca/search?q=play+mpe&client=safari&rls=en&biw=1586&bih=875&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMI3e_7vuW6xwIVCZWICh18Jgr0) Rick.ramsay (talk) 18:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I would describe the use of "Play MPE" in those citations as passing mentions. The articles have nothing to do with the product/service and everything to do with individual artists. Coverage should be about the subject in question. – czar   19:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree they don't qualify as sources but do help establish the relevance of the product described within the music industry so may be useful in assessing notability. Rick.ramsay (talk) 20:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.