Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny for PC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  01:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Destiny for PC
An article about an in-development computer game that has no web site yet, from a software company that has no web site yet.

Delete as vanity and/or promotion. Bo Lindbergh 02:15, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Alhutch 02:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete since WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. "Right now in its third week of production" seals it, since there is a better than average chance the software will never materialise, given the non-existence of the website. (Note that missing the 's' off the company name does turn up a company in Sacramento, but that's not important to this article.) -Splash talk 04:15, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jasmol 04:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - a valid use of the crystal ball reference. Reeking of crystal ball stuff.  It might be great.  It'd be like if I wrote an article about this great novel I thought of writing, but haven't started yet, or published, and it may well be a total flop even if it ever is published.  Yeah, that kind of thing. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 04:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable crystal ballery. - Mgm|(talk) 16:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It can come back later. --Computerjoe 22:11, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The road to development hell is paved with good game ideas. Welcome back, though, when and if the game is 90% done and no might in the world can stop it from getting released - right now, it's a tad bit early to have an article. (Three weeks in development. Bah.) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 02:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.