Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destruction Duet

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge with Mario Party 2. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:09, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Destruction Duet
Stage in Mario Party 2. Delete. A Link to the Past 04:20, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * But if you delete it, what will happen to the comprehensive project to catalog useless fancruft like the individual Mario Party minigames? (Delete, of course.) - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 04:32, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * delete  05:12, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge There's already a list of games in the Mario Party 2 article, simply merge this one sentence there and be done with it. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 10:59, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, not notable all by itself. --Merovingian (t) (c) 11:51, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. --Several Times 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This information isn't all that valuable. Someone could add this information after it is deleted, not like this information needs to be preserved to accomplish this. -- A Link to the Past 13:32, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Not true, as there are licensing issues at work here. Under the GFDL, we must retain attribution to the original author. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  14:32, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The merge target in question doesn't list a description of each game, nor does it need to. --BradBeattie 14:51, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not worth merging.  To prevent a split between "delete" and "merge" resulting in a conclusion of "keep", this vote may also be interpreted as a "redirect" or a "merge" if doing so would allow a consensus to be formed. --Carnildo 23:15, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, describing the minigames in the list would provide useful information. Just because the others haven't been described doesn't mean we shouldn't start to. - Mgm|(talk) 23:20, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing here worth merging or keeping. JamesBurns 04:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Merge or expand, but I haven't seen anyone quote any relevant part of Deletion policy. arj 21:46, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Mariocruft? -- A Link to the Past 14:14, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * I searched for the word "cruft" in the deletion policy, and couldn't find it. Please look at Fancruft for reasons why I find it unnecessarily antagonising in deletion debates. arj 14:21, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's hardly antagonising. It's useful to note that one minigame out of dozens that only has one sentence in it is Mariocruft. -- A Link to the Past 19:22, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.