Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desynchronized


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Desynchronized

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero notability, plain and simple. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - WP:NSONG, WP:GNG - Notability is not inherited. Even though the musician is notable, this does not mean the single is. I could not find multiple neutral secundary sources. A google search for newsitems gave only 1 result about a lawsuit. As such it fails WP:GNG. It did not comply with any of the three criteria at WP:NSONG. - Taketa (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.