Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DethKarz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Creator withdrew their AfD nomination. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

DethKarz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I believe this fails WP:GNG Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Topic has enough coverage from reliable secondary sources, particularly in print sources. GameSpot review, Game Revolution review, IGN review, Computer Gaming World mag review, Jeuxvideo review, Power Play mag review, PC Player mag review, PC Joker mag review, PC Games mag review. --The1337gamer (talk) 08:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per The1337gamer's presented sources, clear failure of WP:BEFORE. Just because an article is a stub does not mean it's not notable.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per The1337gamer and ZXCVBNM, with potential for cited links and paraphrased review information from outside coverage to be added, this article should now be kept for more editing time. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per source list above. Sergecross73   msg me  18:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.