Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deutsch LA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Deutsch LA

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

References fail WP:ORGIND, WP:NCORP, and WP:CORPDEPTH. Refs moslty focuse on singers and other brands with no or brief mentioning of Deutsch LA. 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies,  and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete References are generated from the company and constitute routine business news that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Many of the references come from PR or are press-release driven. The Forbes is a contributor, The Adweek story taken from Twitter, the Wired story fails WP:ORGIND. There is several passing mentions. Fails WP:NCORP. Brochure advertising article from a blocked UPE.   scope_creep Talk  16:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * great detailed analysis of sources! 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 13:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you need a per ref analysis, please ping me.   scope_creep Talk  15:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Scope creep thank you for your job. 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 06:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found no evidence that the company meets WP:GNG. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.