Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DevForce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

DevForce

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable software. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 18:17, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: no sources in the wild; it didn't even deserve editor's reviews on cnet, pcworld, softpedia and other similar places working hard on reviewing every single piece of Windows software out there. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Leaning Delete - Not finding much coverage, particularly in reliable sources. Here's an article from the page InfoQ, which doesn't appear to meet criterion as a reliable source . Here's a Softpedia download page: . If others are able to find reliable sources to qualify this topic's notability, then this !vote will change. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.