Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DevelopIntelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

DevelopIntelligence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional page by SPA. No evidence of notability. WP:BEFORE shows a press release about a later acquisition, and zero RS coverage, let alone anything meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. User removed a PROD, added a pile of press-release sources that don't fix the problem, and rewrote the article to resemble an advertisement even more than it already did. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

UTC)
 * Delete. #1 is not an RS per WP:MEDIUM. #2 has a popup asking to provide an email to keep reading the article, which is not acceptable. #3 is a press release. #4 doesn't have a real author name. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * so you're aware, sources can be paywalled or registration-walled without it impacting on their acceptability on sourcing Nosebagbear (talk) 00:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course, that's normal practice for some libraries and other good sources. However, an unexpected popup suddenly asking to provide personal info doesn't look like a registration-walled source, but more like a task for an ad-blocker. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, may redirect to Pluralsight VViking Talk Edits 22:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Could perhaps move this to a Draft if there are RS to be found. Meaning vet everything being offered and double-check. But current form is not acceptable. - Scarpy (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article looks like a press release and looking at the edit history shows many of the edits were made by accounts obviously associated with the company itself. A redirect to Pluralsight would be sufficient until an article with reliable sources is created.DogsRNice (talk) 05:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.