Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Developers programming language


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Developers programming language
Delete. Simple clone of Brainfuck (essentially just replacing the way the symbols are interpreted), no citations, no categorizations, nothing, possibly made up just for Wikipedia, thus possibly counts as original research. Also it's not funny. // Gargaj 13:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable original research. Would add "unfunny" but that's not really a reason for deletion. Weregerbil 13:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 13:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and per nom. --Ter e nce Ong 13:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, per nominator. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 13:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, pathetically unfunny joke on the Brainfuck programming language. J I P  | Talk 14:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as failing WP:V and possibly WP:OR. Turnstep 16:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unfunny duplicate page. ;-)  Silensor 21:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unfunny. Pavel Vozenilek 21:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Nom. --Krashlandon (e)  21:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. - Sikon 13:21, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Esolang-cruft. —Ruud 05:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.