Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Development management

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Entirely unsourced convoluted essay. Large parts of it also seem to be copy/pasted from a course leaflet or some other study information (see "Choose courses to the value of two full units from the following list in consultation with your supervisor.", "Note that not all of the above optional courses will be available every year." and similar phrases).

"Development management" is probably a worthwhile notable topic, just like release management, software management, facility management, and so on. But the current article version is not salvageable and should be rewritten from scratch and with a completely different encyclopedic concept. GermanJoe (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC) GermanJoe (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:TNT this. Looks to be a combination of WP:COPYVIO and WP:PROMO issues (as well as WP:TONE and more) &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 05:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Looking through its history, without the spam, I can't see that this article has ever been useful to anyone. asnac (talk) 08:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or rewrite as per WP:TNT. Page receives about 40 hits per day so a rewrite or redirect may be useful.Jonpatterns (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely unreferenced. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete But if someone could find an acceptable redirect, I would be open to that too. BenLinus  1214 talk 01:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.