Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deveren Bowman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Deveren Bowman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Professional society not that exclusive, coverage not enough. Sending WP:APPNOTE to, and. Has been tagged for notability for 6 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Blimey, there's a blast from the past. There's no doubt she exists, but there's nothing there that says she's notable. I can't find anything substantial, just basic bios. Ged  UK  13:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything that would make her notable. No shows, no institutional collections, no monographs. Mduvekot (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.