Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deviant sexual intercourse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (NAC) --J.Mundo (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Deviant sexual intercourse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has remained unreferenced since flagged in November 2008, and, though I have not checked every revision, appears to have had no references since its creation. It thus appears to be interesting, but also more of an essay or a personal opinion than a cited, notable and verifiable article. I prodded the article. The prod was reverted with no edit summary, so I am bringing it here for a consensus to be built. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep; it is a term used in US criminal codes, not an 'essay'. Unreferenced yes, but a simple google search would have found this and this on the first page alone. It needs to be cleaned up and referenced yes, but deletion? No. Ironholds (talk) 07:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've now cleaned it up and referenced it. Ironholds (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In which case it behoves me to withdraw the nomination and ask someone to consider a speedy keep on that basis. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.