Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devil May Cry (PlayStation Portable)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Devil May Cry ; can unredirect it once the game is released or when there is at least some reliably-sourced information. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-14 02:56Z 

Devil May Cry (PlayStation Portable)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Highly speculative article that provides no reliable source outside of a release schedule that is subject to change at any moment. Jonny2x4 04:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The simple fact that a DMC is in development for PSP is not enought to warrent an article because that is the only info on it. Article can be re-created when info is known. TJ Spyke 05:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 05:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment/Question I'm not a gamer... but how is a "series" a game? Is this some odd use, or is this a planned series of games, or an individual game in a series... as an outsider it doesn't make any sense. SkierRMH 06:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a game in the Devil May Cry series. I think they entitled it like that so people don't assume it's a port of the first Devil May Cry game. TJ Spyke 06:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Latest articles about this on either Gamespot or IGN date back to 2005, and I see nothing on Capcom's website about this being in production or coming soon. --lightspeedchick 17:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep . Hell, in a few months it'll be notable, and I can see the train wreck waiting to happen with "recreation of deleted material". -- Chris is me (u/c/t) 18:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That would be crystalballism. Also I don't see any reason to worry about it being deleted as a reacreation because for that to be the case the new article would have to be substantially identical to this one. By the time of an offical confirmation there would be enough new info for to add so a speedy deletion would not apply. --70.48.173.37 23:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No, recreation deletions don't have to be the same. Change to Weak Delete due to lack of sources. -- Chris is me (u/c/t) 00:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ship COD to GameFAQs Useless fancruft (delete) NetOracle 02:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an excellent example of crystal-balling. Takes several sentences to say "It's on Capcom's list, we don't know anything else about it". QuagmireDog 10:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep If the game isn't officially canceled, this article should be kept. EliasAlucard|Talk 22:50, 10 Feb, 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: I'm leaning towards keep as well, as games are considered in development until it is announced that they are cancelled or the company goes under. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.