Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devil Worshipping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Theistic Satanism -- JForget 01:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Devil Worshipping

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Author removed PROD tag, so here we are. This essay is entirely original research so I redirected it to Theistic Satanism. Author reverted the redirect and added more original research. — Travis talk  21:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: I chose to redirect to Theistic Satanism rather than Satanism because similar redirect Devil worship points to the former. — Travis talk  21:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I confused it because there was something about that I can freely edit it. But there is no connection in the theistic satanism. In Satan Worshipping the Satanism is only sub category. It includes also all other sciences, Satanism is only studying the Satan thoughts. Satan Worshipping is to give to the Satan worship and love. Describe hes beauty and intelligence. So even the word Theistic is wrong and it have nothing to do about worshipping which is central part of our religion and most important. Satan -ism means Satans thoughts; Satan -worship means hes admiration and worship. Misa666 (talk) 19:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and redirect to Theistic Satanism. --Evb-wiki (talk) 21:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOR then redirect to Satanism.  Sting_au   Talk  21:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Useful as a redirect, but no more. --Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 21:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research; redirect to Theistic Satanism. —  Wen li  (reply here) 00:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Create redirect to Theistic Satanism. — Satori Son 16:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete original research. Pharmboy (talk) 18:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Complete OR. Not encyclopedic. Guldenat (talk) 20:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article is still original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. To salvage the article, please provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Thanks. --Evb-wiki (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Original research. Tanthalas39 (talk) 22:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect as per above. --uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 00:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, and in the meantime, please stop linking to the page from other articles. This kind of half-baked conspiracy theory guff has no place in Wikipedia. Fuzzypeg ☻ 00:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.