Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils Racecourse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Devils Racecourse

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable film. Prod nomination endorsed by two editors. Despite that prod tag was removed. This is the next step. Dr.K. praxislogos 02:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable film from the nebulous future that lacks reliable sources. Original author indef blocked for sock puppetry, if that matters. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable, and not clear that film was ever or will ever be released - even the production company's 'website' (such as it is) no longer mentions the film. Additionally, the only mentions of the film I could find were authored by the production company itself. Finally, some new accounts have sprung up trying to remove the deletion tags as well as the text in the article that notes the non-mention of the film by the production company website. I suspect these are WP:SOCK accounts of the original author's now-blocked account. --4wajzkd02 (talk) 06:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Good points. Thank you. Maybe we can use the services of WP:SPI. Dr.K.praxislogos 06:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability nor any assertion that this will even be made. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  16:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.