Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils bit cider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Devils bit cider

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no possibility of this article being verifiable because there are no references to the product in reliable sources (WP:RS). Wronkiew (talk) 21:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete as while it certainly exists, if someone cares enough about it they can create a real article. MediaMob (talk) 11:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 01:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete a search on google will bring up some stuff, but unless someone wants to tackle the article it has no sources and to me fails WP:N RockManQ (talk) 01:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As per WP:GNG, if there are any reliable sources that cover this product in detail, then that would be enough for me to withdraw my nomination. However, a search on Google turned up only blogs and forum posts mentioning it in passing. That is not enough for a real article. Wronkiew (talk) 03:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Exuberant but uninformative.  This "article" is "There is a cider, and you can buy it in these amounts."  That's nice, but it's not an article.  Furthermore, the article is misnamed, as we would assume that it would be "Devil's Bit cider" or "Devil's Bit Cider."  Furthermore, there is no indication that this is a popular, significant, or unusual cider (nor even what it's a cider of).  This is really an A7 speedy delete.  Utgard Loki (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Delete: Perhaps an article on M&J Gleeson would be more appropriate? Product could be listed on the article about the company that makes it. Some quick searching around, and t seems that while the individual drink may not be notable enough to stand on its own, the company may well be, and the product could be included. ./zro (⠠⠵) 10:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.