Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Gibson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Devin Gibson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced promotional article fails WP:BASIC, WP:AUTHOR, WP:ARTIST, etc Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the concern, after looking over the article once more and revisions from other wiki contributors, I found no promotional material and all statements to be properly cited. It appears Logical Cowboy has suggested a conflict of interest to which i see none. As the creator of the page if there is any promotional material in the article please alert myself or a contributor for revisions.Thank you--Stone2ypr (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Reply What were you paid to create this article? For COI issues, see  re undisclosed paid editing.  Logical Cowboy (talk)

 replyI wasn't paid anything, in fact this was my first article every written with much help from supportive wiki contributors i look forward to creating many more.--Stone2ypr (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article contains multiple references from news media: Newspressed, Bronx News, PSC News, Hollywood Herald, News World Today, plus the Progress for America award announcement. While these are not the most stellar sources, all but the first are all about Gibson, and the first features him in the headline as well as the text. This makes him pass GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Reply With respect, you are wrong about GNG. These are not reliable, independent sources providing in-depth coverage.  These are brief articles, including press release and interview material, appearing in local or bloggy outlets.  Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep sorry for the caputilization--Stone2ypr (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC) — Stone2ypr (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep per Yngvadottir. Hafspajen (talk) 20:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY and more detailed WP:ARTIST etc. as described by nom. Creator of page may be a SPA. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Regardless of whether references are authoritative, does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO.--Rpclod (talk) 06:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep- Seems to meet WP:MUSICBIO to me. He "has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself."  B zw ee bl  (talk • contribs) 21:48, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Response Thanks for your comments, but I wish you would have listed some examples of these good sources. I don't see them.  Half the sources are totally non-reliable like IMDB or Amazon.  The other half are brief articles, including press release and interview material, appearing in local or bloggy outlets.  One of these is about "yacht vandalism"--does not apply to WP:MUSICBIO.  Could you please say which sources qualify under WP:MUSICBIO?  Logical Cowboy (talk) 12:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  09:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | squeal _ 02:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.