Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Devin Guy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod removed without explanation. Non-notable minor league hockey player who has never played in the NHL. Not otherwise notable. Fails WP:ATHLETE. Redfarmer (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:ATHLETE both the EPHL and Central Hockey League that he played during 2008-09 are fully professional hockey leagues. Barely passes, but none the less he passes. -DJSasso (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. While he did play a season in a very, low professional league, there is no actual coverage about him at all.  Fails WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:BIO and the hockey project's notability essay. Resolute 15:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some references are added. While he would barely pass, there is nothing to support the article. If that changes, I'd change my vote. Kaiser matias (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the WP:ATHLETE mark in hockey would be either Olympics or NHL. He's done neither, and I don't see any other reason to include.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:44, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The athlete mark is professional hockey. Not just the NHL. -DJSasso (talk) 10:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Athlete gets re-written all the time. It used to say "at the highest level" I believe, to preculde a free pass minor league baseball and semi-pro football as examples.  It currently states "except for those that participated only in competitions that are themselves non-notable" and I would argue that the league in question and contests in the league in question are non-notable.  But hey, I'm open to it--let's hear the facts!--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I realize this is in the process of being debated. I do believe the line you quote is referring to non-league sports like swimming and tennis. I was just pointing out for the most part that we do include anyone who played in the minors, but are hopefully about to change the door on that with NSPORT. This basic wording of WP:ATHLETE has actually been in effect since Oct. 3, 2005. It has never required the highest level for pro, just amateurs. Baring small unsupported changes that may have occured and been reverted. -DJSasso (talk) 13:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources provided at all. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.