Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Taylor Altieri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedied as nonsense. Ryan Delaney talk 03:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Devin Taylor Altieri

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

CSD "contested", but subject obviously falls under category which it was filed (CSD A7) - non notable person.

Delete ASAP. vlad§inger tlk  03:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete G1, so tagged. I think the concern is with the A7 rationale; this is patent nonsense. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I was thinking it was turned down, in actuality, the creator placed a hangon and put "dont delete this" on the talk. Still patent nonsense. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy A7 not to SNOW this, but its pretty obvious this needs to get deleted.--Finalnight (talk) 03:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as first tagged (A7). It names a real person and makes a coherent statement (eliminating G1 as a valid rationale) about that person, which does not establish notability outside the article creator's head (establishing A7).  If we can understand what is being said, however pointless and silly it may be, it's not incoherent, and that is why G1 is not appropriate.  Question: why is there even an AfD on this?  Back when I used to use an account, the twitterings of neopubescent would-be romeos were speedy deleted within seconds.  206.116.63.240 (talk) 03:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.