Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexter's Odyssey: A Tale of The Tim Box Wars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Dexter's Odyssey: A Tale of The Tim Box Wars
Someone wants it deleted? Timbox129 06:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, that would be I - zero google results and judging by the opening alone it is either non-notable, nonsense or falls under made up in school one day. ––Lid(Talk) 06:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * WTF Man, this took me THREE schooldays to make this. Timbox129 06:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You may wish to read Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day and Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. –– Lid(Talk) 06:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You know, maybe I should! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timbox129 (talk • contribs)


 * Speedy Delete per Lid. TJ Spyke 06:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT. Not sure it is speedyable. Resolute 07:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Lid. (As much as three days?!) Emeraude 09:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Let's all join hands and sing together. Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not for thiiiings, made up in schooool one sunshiny day. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  16:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per Lid and IslaySolomon's song. --tgheretford (talk) 17:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SNOW and the Song of (islay)Solomon. The author admits that it was made up in school one day. Well, three days, actually, but it doesn't matter. --N Shar 18:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SNOW and WP:NFT. ColourBurst 23:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * delete we do not need this one really Yuckfoo 02:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.