Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dextrose Leavening


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Dextrose Leavening

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence this is a real process. Unsourced, and most Google results are for unrelated uses of both words next to each other in ingredients lists, in which the words are separated by commas. This indicates that they aren't talking about the subject of the article. The article also seems like a contradiction in that it starts off talking about a process but then seems to be talking about a food additive of some sort, and is in the category "Sweeteners". In short, this seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:V and may, in fact, be a hoax. Even if it is not it is still non-notable and so should be deleted. Everymorning  talk  20:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Looks like one for the WP:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. Almost six years, impressive. (That's a delete, and I suppose we want to get rid of User:Roeback93 as well?) Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete It's utter nonsense. The same text appears on the OC's user page. I suppose, it was meant as a hoax, and they are still laughing about it. It's also the hoaxster's only contribution to Wikipedia. Kraxler (talk) 13:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.