Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dextroverse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 06:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Dextroverse
The web site is non-notable and thus, doesnt deserve a seperate article on on Wikipedia.

I know the dexheads will swarm this with their over-the-top harm reduction beliefs but just listen for a second first. The Dextroverse already has a link at the bottom of the non-medical use of DXM page so having a seperate article is no necessary. It is not like the Dextroverse is as noteworthy as Erowid. delete There is nothing to merge that isn't already there. --Arm 17:01, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Agree with nom, that a separate article is not needed. ---Aude 16:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and already mentined elsewhere.--Isotope23 17:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.