Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deyermond Field


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 06:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Deyermond Field

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable stadium — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. What makes the field notable is how it was built -- on an improperly sealed landfill site that the town now has to re-seal at considerable expense. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  05:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Has received little significant coverage outside of the local newspaper. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Millions of these sorts of fields exist all over the world. This one has nothing particularly noteworthy about it. The story about the landfill is a local news curiosity but thats all. Spanneraol (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: I find nothing in any notability criteria, Eastmain's assertion notwithstanding, giving a presumptive pass for ball fields built on landfills, and await Eastmain's linking to the same. Failing that, this certainly fall short of the GNG.   Ravenswing   23:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seriously, is someone actually defending the encyclopedic significance of a Little League baseball field?  Fails WP:GNG and WP:ONEEVENTto the extent it has achieved a certain local notoriety in eastern Massachusetts, it is solely a result of the environmental issues.  Please review WP:ONEEVENT and consider the policy principles embodies there.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dirtlawyer1. AutomaticStrikeout 22:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.