Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dfinity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Dfinity

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCRYPTO and WP:NCORP only coverage seems to be about fundraisers, lacks depth. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Switzerland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete all sources are about funding announcements and the like. Oaktree b (talk) 00:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


 * : Originally closed as "soft delete", which was contested. I have reopened the discussion. ✗  plicit  14:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Probably shouldn't be deleted. Value from this article exists currently, and will further develop over time. 2601:18F:480:8A0:EDD5:3CCE:51B0:2F56 (talk) 00:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * DFINITY is a real non profit foundation dedicated to R&D that supports the Internet Computer Protocol blockchain. In my opinion, these wiki pages should not be deleted.  They bring a lot of value to web3 concepts and capabilities. 73.115.24.162 (talk) 02:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Why is this considered for deletion and where else do you discuss the dfinity foundation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1210:2A80:5B00:7D24:AA81:21BA:6BC1 (talk) 00:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The reason for considering this article for deletion is in the deletion statement at the top of this discussion. The only place to discuss the article subject is on its talk page but that page is for discussing improvements to the article, it's not a discussion forum. This discussion is the place to discuss whether or not the article should be deleted based on Wikipedia policy-based reasons. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Borderline delete - coverage in three RSes, which is good for a crypto thing - but when you look it's funding rounds and WP:CRYSTAL. That's not really enough to pass WP:NCORP. A bit of a REFBOMB of passing mentions and yellow-rated sources that can't be used for notability, like TechCrunch. This isn't there yet - David Gerard (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Borderline delete, Agree with David Gerard, these sources feel like the best of the bunch to me.   From my understand of the guidelines listed above, I do not feel that these sources establish notability. You play to win the game (talk) 23:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.