Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dgip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  05:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Dgip

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be the author's own research and ideas. Although references are given, not notable enough for an article, methinks. Chris 20:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, obvious conflict of interest as article author is User:Cyang3, while the term was coined by C. Yang. According to the article itself, all references given (except the "coining" one) predate the invention of Dgip. --Huon 22:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The references are to verify statements in the article, but they do not assert notability of the topic. i said 02:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this looks more like a promotional essay for those ideas than an encyclopaedia article. No sources that establish notability, this is probably original research.  Mel sa  ran  03:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - neologism with insufficient evidence of notability or that it can be amplified into a full article. TerriersFan 00:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.