Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhammakaya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 06:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Dhammakaya
Was listed for speedy on the grounds of being advertising, but that's not a speedy criterion. I'm not convinced it is advertising; maybe this is a notable religious movement. No vote from me. Angr/undefined 20:16, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I think Dhammakaya itself is notable but this seems to be advertising for a specific subset of the movement.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  20:28, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete For one thing, the article has copyright problems; it seems to be a copy of this page.  I do think that this organization might ultimately be worthy of an article, but the information provided on the current article is way too far from NPOV to be salvagable- we'd be left with nothing but a few names.  I createed a new stub from information on the Foundation's website at Dhammakaya Foundation that should serve until more specific, non-POV info can be located.  'Dhammakaya' is the Pali equivalent of the Sanskrit 'dharmakaya'- something quite specific in Buddhist philosophy, and not really related to this particular organization.  --Clay Collier 20:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actually, it was listed as an A1 because of a lack of context, and if I had been thinking, it would have been A3, as well. (I was the one who listed it for speedy deletion.) Since I tagged it, though, context has been added, so it's no longer speediable. In any case, this article isn't a useful start for an article about the organization, as it's hopelessly POV and possibly copyvio. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 00:39, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.