Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhananjay Kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Dhananjay Kumar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ACADEMIC. Rd232 talk 01:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is just a cv, not an article, so even if kept it would need major work to get into shape. The Google scholar citation counts (60, 55, 48, etc, for an h-index of 17) aren't impressive enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. And the awards listed are all very minor. As the nominator concludes, he does not appear to pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sorting by subject matter I find GS cites of 60, 48, 25, 22, 18, 17, 9, 5 .... to give an h index of 7. Not so impressive. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC).


 * Don't Delete. This article can be reframed. Let the student community know their professors. I don't find any item exaggerated here. By deleting this article, we will be discouraging others in particular student community who likes to see their professors on such platform. Students are one of the major stakeholders of Wikipedia and hence their interests also need to be preserved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishnan KP (talk • contribs) 12:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)  — Krishnan KP (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF, Wikipedia is not a freshman orientation handbook for a local university. Ray  Talk 17:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Retain if Room, I don’t know, what is the definition of “a local university” as pointed by ‘Ray’. If an institute is local it cannot be university; conversely, a university cannot be local. By the way, the university mentioned in this article i.e. “Anna University” is not a local university in any stretch of imagination. Someone can easily verify it by Google search. If Wikipedia has a strict guideline and tightly defined notability of professors WP:PROF, this article on “Dr. Dhananjay Kumar” must be deleted without any further delay. As far as research contribution of this professor is concerned, I am enthused to appreciate after going through some his research papers. Someone, who is aware of the contribution (including social/non-technical) of this professor, can update this article. Finally, if Wikipedia team has no much objection, I would vote for retention of this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodrigs F (talk • contribs) 15:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)  — Rodrigs F (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Wikipedia does have strict guidelines and tightly defined notability of professors. They are described in WP:Prof, which the editor above is advised to read before commenting further. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.