Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhananjay acharya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Dhananjay acharya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional, does not meet WP:GNG. Speedy reverted by SPA. ubiquity (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable WP:BIO unsupported by reliable sources Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  16:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There was an attempt to get this restored at REFUND where they claimed that Acharya made the world's first student social network. I can see nothing to substantiate this and as far as I can tell, StudentWisdom was launched in 2014. That puts it years after Facebook launched as a student-only social network and a year after this network started up. There's no mention of him in India's newspapers from what I can find and a Google search produces nothing either. Even if StudentWisdom was the first social network for students (which appears to not be the case) that in itself doesn't automatically mean that Acharya is notable - he'd still require coverage in independent and reliable sources. I'd suggest speedying this as spam, except that this was recreated quite quickly and I think that a formal AfD would eventually become necessary in order to prevent further re-creation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I just speedied StudentWisdom, which was created by a separate editor. I have to ask both editors, and, what is your relation to one another and do you have a conflict of interest with the articles? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable person. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

May be Whoever created this article Dhananjay acharya is a notable person.an article published about this person.please check this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveenbt (talk • contribs) 11:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) May be student network created before studentwisdom. but studentwisdom is a first student social network sharing 70% of revenue to the users. please below evidence http://newkannada.com/2015/11/%E0%B2%B9%E0%B2%A3-%E0%B2%97%E0%B2%B3%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%81%E0%B2%B5-%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%AE%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%9C%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%95-%E0%B2%9C%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%B2%E0%B2%A4%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%A3.html http://newkannada.com/2016/01/is-facebook-afraid-of-student-social-network-rival-studentwisdom.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveenbt (talk • contribs) 11:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * This does not appear to be a reliable source. I am also a bit confused by it, since the page is labelled "Film News". ubiquity (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Please check out the photos and he is a notable person. he is the young CEO, started a company at the age of 22. and created many job opportunities. and he was chief guest of pool campus drive where he is studied in same college just after graduated from 2 years. he is a local famous notable person. and he came from poor family (refer above attached local kannada news paper) and he achieved. according to recent news he is starting a company or service name bhavyabharath with this creating 3000+ jobs in india. So this guy is a inspiration to others. wikipedia is for famous figures. you people should encourage these things.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveenbt (talk • contribs) 05:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.