Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhananjaya Das Kathiababa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Dhananjaya Das Kathiababa
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I would have have draftified this but there is already a draft. This article was a Frankenstein’s monster of religious fancruft, repeated material and appalling referencing. I removed unsourced material and then went through all the refs. Most were utter nonsense that had nothing to do with the article subject, or just mentioned his name but did not support the content of the article. There are only three sources left. One is not independent and I can’t access the other two. I’m prepared to believe that the subject may indeed be notable, but if they are this very poor article does them no favours. Mccapra (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Hinduism, India,  and West Bengal. Mccapra (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poorly sourced article and does not corroborate with the subject. I do not see any beneficial contribution and significant notability from this poorly sourced article.RangersRus (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable person. It is a recreation of an article that has been to AFD twice before.  Most of the article appears to have been written by Srabanta Deb using various accounts to evade his/her block. Srabanta Deb usually recreates deleted articles using slightly different versions of the same name to make it harder to spot what he/she is doing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 17:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.