Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhangar Scheduled tribe issue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dhangar .  MBisanz  talk 02:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Dhangar Scheduled tribe issue

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not sure this is notable enough to be its own article. This also falls under Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect - to Dhangar under controversy. It appears to be a legitimate claim. ShoesssS Talk 05:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This is an ongoing controversial issue which has serious effects and outcomes. Please do not delete. The article states undisputed facts and is neutral. TheShepherds (talk) 08:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not delete this article, it gives vital information and has serious constitutional consequences.BACLA (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Most of the votes are for a merge, which means that the contents would instead be incorporated into the larger Dhangers article, not deleted. However, all the supporters are not being helpful when they are including sections like "Ex-Minister of Maharashtra Shri. Anna Dange gets his forehead injured by hitting it on the walls of the Collector office at Sangli so that the Government would seriously look into the matter. Thousands of people protest at Sangli." as relevant information.  Those who are serious about this subject need to take it seriously and police themselves as well.  Things like that take away from your credibility as to the significance of the issue. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hello Ricky81682, I think you are misconstruing Keep - merge/redirect - delete and heavily editing the piece. When I posted my Merge/redirect opinion, I am saying that the title is legitimate  and a encylodic topic.  Therefore not subject to delete, because it could be expected that an individual may have a reasonable expectation to search for additional information for on this site.  However the topic has not gained enough notability to stand on its own and would be best served as part of a larger genre that explains the whole situation involved.  This does not mean the article should not be heavily edited either before or after the merge.  I agree that there are POV involved with this piece, but that can be fixed.  Hope this helps in explaining the reasoning behind my merge/redirect. ShoesssS Talk 15:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge in Dhangar. Falls under WP: SOAP. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 05:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.