Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhani Kumharan, Taranagar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep a listing in the Government of India official census qualifies under GEOLAND --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Dhani Kumharan, Taranagar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject place has no significance and none of the claims mentioned about the place are sourced. No notability MahenSingha (Talk) 20:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  23:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally recognized places like villages are usually presumed notable. The village clearly exists. The article needs cleanup and more sources, but arguably not deletion. /wiae /tlk  23:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep As a populated and legally recognised place. AusLondonder (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Each and every village in India is certainly listed on the census reports but this does not make the village specific or notable. Can we have article for every village? then what is "notability" and in case of places what are the parameters to decide it? Please go through WP:GEOLAND once again, the very first statement of it says that census tracts are usually not considered notable. It also says that Geographical features must be notable on their own merits. -MahenSingha (Talk)  06:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GEOLAND as a legally recognized place . North America1000 09:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GEOLAND; the Indian census says it exists the nominator thinks otherwise. I'll go with the source rather than the opinion. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.