Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I just came across this article. I read WP:GNG and it says a topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I had also read the previous discussion and I think is right. Here are some of my findings below which are almost similar to the previous nominator.

Citation 1-The portion of the book that discusses Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani predominantly consists of his own quotes, with minimal input from the author. Does not help to meet GNG.

Citation:2 It is evident from the title itself that this printed article solely presents his perspective on the Indian economy. WP:INTERVIEWS.

Citation:3-There is only a minimal mention that briefly discusses Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani's presence on a stage alongside his father. It lacks substantial coverage on him, but it indicates that his appointment as GCA president is a political decision. It is still not helping to meet GNG.

Citation 5- Same opinion as the previous nom. WP:CHURN.

Citation 6: Merely a profile of Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani found on a generic media portal that does not meet the criteria of being considered a reliable source according to WP:RS.

Citation 7: announcement of his election as the head of the state football association. Does not count towards GNG.

Citation 8: brief mention of Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani being appointed as a vice president of GCA. Does not count towards notability.

Citation 10: Interview. So does not count towards notability.

Holding two administrative positions is not a guaranteed notability factor. Citations that address the topic directly is and in detail is required which is clearly missing here. So this article must be removed. Irbasdude (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Surprised to see this article renominated after only two months since the last AFD. Soft deletion is not an option so we'll need more participation here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Irbasdude (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: While you might have valid reasons for renominating, it's important for all of us to adhere to the WP:6MONTHS rule which states; if the discussion regarding last AfD resulted in a 'keep' decision, it's typically advisable to refrain from proposing the page for deletion again for a minimum of six months, unless there are fresh points to raise. Charlie (talk) 04:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: absence of significant coverage to meet GNG. Some sources utilized in the article does seem to be mainly PR piece. Most of the sources are trivial, routine, re-written ones. The other option is a redirect to Reliance Industries Limited. 103.182.166.145 (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete and possibly salt. I don’t think this subject is notable yet, and I agree with ip above. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 12:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Reliance Industries Limited. Worldiswide (talk) 03:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Most of the sources are about him taking over the role of the president of GCA which is incidential and does not count towards notability. At first glance, the 6th citation from All Gujarat News seems to have given some coverage. But it is a sponsored content with no byline. The same applies to other sources as well. The offline sources appear to be interviews.l which is primary sources. So this article fails our notability criteria. Redirecting is not a good option as he is not holding a permanent position. It can change at anytime. 111.92.123.60 (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient coverage to warrant a standalone article. I'm also opposed to redirecting, as the subject is not even mentioned at the proposed target. CycloneYoris talk! 02:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 02:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.