Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharavi Bank (2022 web series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW as well (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 19:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Dharavi Bank (2022 web series)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Streaming TV series doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - coverage is largely WP:ROUTINE stories for a TV series. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - nominator should aware of "standard practice for TV articles". Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - seem to be a lot of sources and reviews. JMWt (talk) 11:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with you to keep, but be aware of WP:REFBOMB. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are many secondary sources (including reviews) dedicated to the series which are referenced in the article, should be sufficient to meet WP:NTVNATL. It is not wholly clear from the nom why this has been sent to AFD.  ResonantDistortion 12:23, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television,  and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The independent reviews meet notability. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep 3+ full length reviews from NDTV, Hindustan Times, Firstpost meet the requirements. Reviews are primary contributor to GNG for works of art, they are not routine. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Many more sources can be added. The article should be retitled as streaming television is different from web series. Kailash29792 (talk)  06:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.