Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharmendra banshal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete (A7 No claim of significance and persistent sock puppetry) by

Dharmendra banshal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Speedy template removed by IP editor. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete In order for a 20 year old businessman to be notable, we would expect truly significant, in depth coverage of the person in multiple independent reliable sources. In this case, we have . . . pretty much nothing. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and EBSCO found zero reliable sources, so does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I don't see any credible claim of significance, especially given the clumsy attempt to claim that the person is a Member of Parliament in Dharmendra banshal bhartiy. There have been other speedy-deleted versions of the article as well and there are several SPAs involved. All in all this seems very much like somebody's desperate attempts to add themself to Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 05:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * See Sockpuppet investigations/Dharmendra bansal - I will tag this for speedy deletion as created by a block evading sockpuppet. --bonadea contributions talk 14:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Procedural note I've speedied the article and create protected it. There's not even a kernal of significance noted and the article is replete with sockpuppets.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.