Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dheeraj Budhori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Dheeraj Budhori

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Looks like a promotional article on a non-notable topic.  Ts12rAc talk to me 11:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Found nothing on a google search. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * keep Found knowledge panel on a google search https://g.co/kgs/HrKTfZ found notability ok with article. And citations appeared to be reliable source Not should be delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheetalnik (talk • contribs) 14:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC) — Sheetalnik (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.   Blocked sock --Blablubbs (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Google Knowledge Panel is not the stamp of notability. -Hatchens (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: Self promotion. himself is the creator of this page. - Hatchens (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as it's clear WP:PROMO. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per this source. Associated with notable Notability (academics) significant source [https://kvk.bibliothek.kit.edu/hylib-bin/kvk/nph-kvk2.cgi?maske=kvk-redesign&lang=en&title=KIT-Bibliothek%3A+Karlsruher+Virtueller+Katalog+KVK+%3A+Ergebnisanzeige&head=%2F%2Fkvk.bibliothek.kit.edu%2Fasset%2Fhtml%2Fhead.html&header=%2F%2Fkvk.bibliothek.kit.edu%2Fasset%2Fhtml%2Fheader.html&spacer=%2F%2Fkvk.bibliothek.kit.edu%2Fasset%2Fhtml%2Fspacer.html&footer=%2F%2Fkvk.bibliothek.kit.edu%2Fasset%2Fhtml%2Ffooter.html&css=none&input-charset=utf-8&ALL=&TI=&AU=&CI=&ST=&PY=&SB=9789356072800&SS=&PU=&target=_blank&VERBUENDE=&kataloge=SWB&kataloge=BVB&kataloge=NRW&kataloge=HEBIS&kataloge=HEBIS_RETRO&kataloge=KOBV_SOLR&kataloge=GBV&kataloge=DDB&kataloge=STABI_BERLIN&kataloge=TIB&kataloge=OEVK_GBV&kataloge=VD16&kataloge=VD17&kataloge=VD18&kataloge=VOE&kataloge=ZDB&OESTERREICH=&kataloge=BIBOPAC&kataloge=LBOE&kataloge=OENB&SCHWEIZ=&kataloge=SWISSBIB&kataloge=HELVETICAT&kataloge=BASEL&kataloge=ETH&kataloge=VKCH_RERO&kataloge=NLAU&kataloge=VERBUND_BELGIEN&kataloge=DAENEMARK_REX&kataloge=EROMM&kataloge=ESTER&kataloge=NB_FINNLAND&kataloge=FINNLAND_VERBUND&kataloge=BNF_PARIS&kataloge=ABES&kataloge=COPAC&kataloge=BL&kataloge=NB_ISRAEL&kataloge=VERBUND_ISRAEL&kataloge=EDIT16&kataloge=ITALIEN_VERBUND&kataloge=ITALIEN_SERIALS&kataloge=CISTI&kataloge=NLCA&kataloge=LUXEMBURG&kataloge=NB_NIEDERLANDE&kataloge=VERBUND_NORWEGEN&kataloge=NB_POLEN&kataloge=PORTUGAL&kataloge=STAATSBIB_RUSSLAND&kataloge=VERBUND_SCHWEDEN&kataloge=BNE&kataloge=REBIUN&kataloge=NB_TSCHECHIEN&kataloge=NB_UNGARN&kataloge=NLM&kataloge=WORLDCAT&BUCHHANDEL=&kataloge=ABEBOOKS&kataloge=AMAZON_DE&kataloge=AMAZON_US&kataloge=ANTIQUARIAT&kataloge=BOOKLOOKER&kataloge=KNO&kataloge=ZVAB&VOLLTEXTE=&kataloge=BASE&kataloge=DART_EUROPE&kataloge=DIGIBIB&kataloge=DFG_EBOOKS&kataloge=DFG_AUFSAETZE&kataloge=DOABOOKS&kataloge=DOAJ&kataloge=EROMM_WEBSEARCH&kataloge=EUROPEANA&kataloge=GOOGLE_BOOKS&kataloge=KUNST_HATHI&kataloge=ARCHIVE_ORG&kataloge=OAPEN&kataloge=ZVDD&ref=direct&client-js=yes] . Reason of Keeping is that person is also contributor in wikipedia,Good thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrycruise01 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)   Blocked sock --Blablubbs (talk) 11:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No, it's not a good thing. Contributors have user pages where they can (within limits) write about themselves. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Also being associated with someone notable wouldn't automatically make them notable, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The citations appear to be reliable sources published in academic 1 2. User is adding their own page doing self-promotion but fullfiling WP:YOURSELF but i'll not say that it is self promotion because i have able to locate signifcant, reliable, independent coverage book, research 1 2 3 from Amazon which is helpful to verify citation according to wp:book source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranshu28 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)  — Pranshu28 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.   Blocked sock --Blablubbs (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Merely having a book published is not notable. Are there any independant reviews of his work to meet WP:NAUTHOR? -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment as guidelines in WP:AUTHOR yes I checked from identifier system part of ISO ISNI independent and notable work so it's pass WP:NAUTHOR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrycruise01 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * None of the sources linked so far indicate that the subject has achieved any more than to write a self-published book. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete You don't get to write articles about yourself, obviously not notable anyway. Reywas92Talk 14:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * keep keep as per WP:YS WP:RS TishKit(talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. TishKit (talk) 04:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)  Blocked sock --Blablubbs (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The sockpuppetry in this discussion is so inept that it's embarrassing. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.