Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhoomangunj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. I don't see compelling evidence for a move so will tag the article for further study and discussion. Eluchil404 04:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Dhoomangunj

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

potential non-notable place with no reference Chris!  c t 03:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Too early- let's see what someone can do to it first...JJJ999 05:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment What do you mean too early? The article is created back in February, that is more than enough time to write a FA. Chris!  c t 05:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Consensus is that places are inherently notable. Alansohn 05:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Alansohn; towns, villages, and place names are inherently notable, and I was able to find some, if not much, confirmation that the place actually exists. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Very few results on Google, but some results for Dhoomanganj, which is possibly the same place. - Snigbrook 15:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If Dhoomanganj is the preferred spelling, we should probably move the article to the more prevalent title. Alansohn 15:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Dhoomanganj per Alansohn. GlassCobra 17:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Such geographical places are automatically notable as there is evidence that it exists but consider moving as per above. Davewild 07:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Kee[ inhabited places re notable, including all townships such as this. The material for the article will increase,but even if it does not, stubs are perfectly acceptable. DGG (talk) 20:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.