Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhruv Verma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Dhruv Verma

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only claim to fame is a leading role in an unreleased film, which I also nominated for deletion (see Articles for deletion/No Means No (film)). Since the film will be released within 6 months, and that might cause this person to "become notable" as Wikipedia defines the term, I recommend an outcome of move to Draft:, with a requirement that it go through WP:AFC. Note that the film becoming "notable" does not mean this actor automatically becomes "notable" and vice-versa. However, if one does "achieve notability" the odds are significantly higher that the other also will. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete we need to nip in the bud this creation of articles before people are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify. Agree with nom's recommendation to draftify unless the film is kept. If it is deemed notable, no issue with a redirect of the actor to the film until such time as independent notability is established.      StarM 02:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominator comment: Just to clarify, it is possible that the film may not become "notable" in the next few months but the actor might. For example, he may get picked up for another film which generates enough significant, independent coverage in reliable sources to qualify for an article while the current-upcoming film does not. Unlikely, but possible.  I had not considered the option of redirecting the page about the actor to that of the film if the film becomes notable but the actor does not.  I'll have to think about that before supporting or opposing that outcome.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  16:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. Most likely UPE/CoI spam. RationalPuff (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 (talk) 07:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.