Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhurwaayaale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  23:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Dhurwaayaale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

OK, this time, the feature is plainly there, and it's a hill, as described: but is a hill notable? I found one incidental mention in the preface to this poem, but Google translate was not helpful. Mangoe (talk) 10:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 11:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 11:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * In general named geographics are often (but not always) considered notable, but I can't see anything relevant about it. Prince of Thieves (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd almost start up a policy discussion on these stubs to better delete them. I'm having trouble deciding how to vote myself. SportingFlyer (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * My understanding is the policy already allows deletion of less relevant stubby articles, it's not giving any "inherent notability", merely stating Named natural features are often notable. In fact it says:

Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river.
 * So in this situation, this hill may be mentioned in the article on the geography of the region, since it cannot be developed using known sources. Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or merge per Prince of Thieves (thank you for that!) SportingFlyer (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kagundu  Talk To Me  07:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.