Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhusor Borno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Dhusor Borno

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Note: I'm not advocating deletion, I would be fine with draft space incubation, but the creator is not willing to wait for a neutral, independent review so we have no choice but AfD. While it's not clear whether it meets NFILM at the moment, I believe there's a chance sourcing could be found, but it is not suitable to remain in mainspace currently. Star  Mississippi  20:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  20:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  20:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Courtesy as CSD/drafters.  Star   Mississippi  20:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no awards/recognition, and I'm not seeing any NFSOURCES.-KH-1 (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Can this article be approved under WikiProject India, WikiProject Tripura, WikiProject Film, rating it as C-Class on the project's quality scale respectively.@Star Mississippi Ninjakiller07 (talk) 09:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * While projects are free to use their own scale, there is no indication this is a C class article and it has to be kept in order to be rated. Please spend a little more time learning how Wikipedia works and what is needed in an article before worrying about rating Star   Mississippi  13:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article does not speak for itself and does not explain why this film is notable. There is nothing in this article that addresses either film notability or general notability.
 * This article was moved to draft space once and moved back to article space by the originator, so it doesn't need to go back into draft space. If sources are found, a new version can be written using the sources.
 * I have not done a copyright check, but it reads like a blurb.
 * Delete Per nom, The short film not yet passes WP:NFILM. References do not satisfy WP:SIGCOV. DMySon (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet the requirements of NFILM / GNG. No point in draftying a non-notable subject when new sources unlikely to emerge after the AfD -- Ab207 (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of notability, and is entirely promotional in style. Nothing there to draftify, really. --bonadea contributions talk 09:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam supported by fake news black-hat SEO spam sites. I have blocked the creator. MER-C 15:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability, and is very promotional. Gabe114 (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Content present is non-notable, fails WP:GNG. TimothyStellar (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.