Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Di$h and ShiQuana

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 00:43, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

Di$h and ShiQuana
T]]/C 01:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The "band" has 4 hits on Google and only 1 hit when parenthesis are used.  On top of that, the one hit is a MySpace website.  The article also includes a the header "Di$h and ShiQuana are "the most famous bitches you eva met". -- MacAddct1984 21:16, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity and advert, attempting to use Wikipedia to bolster the band's notibility. Func( t, c, e, ) 23:33, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete. It is, after all, a real band. The information in the Wikipedia article are all factual, nor do they advertise any product, nor is the article spam.  Also, the "offensive" part of the "offensive" header is in quotation marks. – (Unsigned comment by 149.77.22.107, the article's creator. User's 11th edit.)
 * Delete if I understand correctly, a non-notable band falls under the new criteria for CSD. &mdash; Il&gamma;&alpha;&eta;&epsilon;&rho;   (T&alpha;l&kappa;) '' 00:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the CSD for band vanity did not gain consensus. Only articles about singular people that do not assert notability may be speedied, if the criterion is followed strictly. android  79  01:01, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity, NN and not Encyclopedia worthy.... and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball &mdash; Digital Thief 00:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems interesting and relevant. Voyager640 00:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of meeting any of the inclusion criteria for bands. No allmusic.com entry. android  79  01:01, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * See also Votes for deletion/Synth-hop. android  79  21:58, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Band vanity rubbishness. - Hahnchen 01:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per android. Fernando Rizo [[User_talk:Fernando Rizo|
 * Delete. Jaxl | talk 01:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Further google searching finds 8 more hits on Google. A relatively-unknown but legitimate band with a sizable following, and all of their links and claims are valid. &mdash; (Unsigned comment by 24.215.250.37; user's 3rd edit.)
 * Please see WP:MUSIC. android  79  03:28, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN, doesn't meet WP:MUSIC Criteria --Camw 03:49, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delte Non-notable band with a very small following. Uses the phrase "dope-assss rhymez" seriously in an article. GregAsche 04:02, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sock-supported band vanity.  --Idont Havaname 06:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons stated. I looked at their page...it's nothing more than a picture.  Begone, socks! - Lucky 6.9 06:31, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for band vanity, unverifiable claims. --Several Times 13:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP They are found in compilation cds and have a large college following. &mdash; (Unsigned comment by 38.117.172.162; user's 2nd edit.)
 * Delete. Clear vanity page.  Dottore So 17:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is satisfactory evidence of the identity of the band "Di$h and ShiQuana." Evidence is found in articles written about this band, as well as the band's history of concerts and cds. Thus acknowledgment of the band Di$h and ShiQuana should be taken. – (Duplicate vote by 38.117.172.162.)
 * Delete, vanity. User:Premeditated Chaos 21:45, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete due to failure to meet WP:Music popularity with sockpuppets. Capitalistroadster 00:47, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sock puppets where it hurts them most. Alf 14:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm pretty sure that Di$h and ShiQuana are not "the most famous bitches you eva met".  Parallel or Together? 04:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.