Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dia de los Muertos (2015 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Dia de los Muertos (2015 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Way too early for this article, with no suggestion that the film has approached final rendering stage. Per WP:NFF, this should be deleted, or, at minimum, redirect to a subhead under Pixar.  McDoob AU  93  20:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator; also will support redirect to Pixar article. -- McDoob  AU  93  20:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFF. I think the best reply to this article is the first reply to the Tweet which is its only source: "Awesome! Remind us again in a few years!" JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * To clarify, even if not used in the stub article, there are more sources available, but yes... this one is far too soon.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:25, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I say that the maximum distance in the future a film should be in theatres to have a good article is about 3 years, which means that this film is too far off in the future. Re-create in 2013. Georgia guy (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, and set redirect to Pixar to prevent premature article recreation. Pixar is the one spot where this as-yet-untitled project now has all the sourced mention it curently may need.  Only just announced two days ago.  Waaaaaay TOO SOON for a separate article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:22, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Only source is a tweet, WP:RS. and doesn't exist, WP:BALL. No objection to redirect to Pixar article. DocTree (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relist as Speedy I request that the subject should be G7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. WebTV3 (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * A G7 request could only be accepted from user, the article author. JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NFF is clear.  Should really have been speedily redirected.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.