Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diablo: The Hell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Diablo: The Hell

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable as the article is about a user-made add-on for a video game. StaticGull Talk  13:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Why send this to AfD? As far as I can see this is a speedy deletion job. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, the bureaucracy :-). Software isn't allowed to be tagged with an A7. StaticGull Talk  13:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I couldn't find any reliable sources. Axl (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable video game mod. J I P  | Talk 17:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable video game mod. has zero independent sources --T-rex 00:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per T-Rex, nothing here worth noting. JuJube (talk) 01:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want to delete this article please at least merge it with Diablo: Hellfire article. There is already an external link to The Hell website. This game mod project is quite big and has a long history of development. It might be of interest for many old Diablo fans, especially after Diablo 3 announcement was made. I found this mod on Wikipedia too and I was really grateful for the information! Thanks in advance! CAH81 17:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find an appropriate reference. If you can find one, please add it to the article. Axl (talk) 21:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by appropriate reference? If the website and both the forums are not enough references, what do you expect? A review from IGN or GameSpy? Well until we trademark it, that's not possible BUT that does not make the mod non-notable! This project has more work and effort included, than the work you've done deleting articles... ATPoseidon (talk) 03:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I mean a reliable source. Currently the article contains a single reference: to the creators' website. I have no doubt that the designers have worked very hard on this mod. However we need another source to demonstrate that this article is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Axl (talk) 09:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.