Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dialdirect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Dialdirect

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cannot find any sources proving notable, other than advertising. Not to be confused with the UK company "Dial Direct". GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Just noting that the nominator is now indefinitely blocked for copyright problems. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies,  and South Africa.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Amount of failed verifications makes me wonder if aside from the from the company existing, the rest of the article is fictitious. -- D'n'B-t -- 10:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.