Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dialectic in the Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Dialectic in the Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

obscure and now-forgotten neologism The Dissident Aggressor 22:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not appear like it was ever significant enough to merit an article. SnowFire (talk) 23:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: User:SnowFire is right: it's actually an article about a neologism! The most generous reading of the article is that it's about WP:ONEEVENT. By both standards, the article fails notability standards. (Lehman organized it in 2008? That's quite a pill.) Hithladaeus (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Books, browser and News found nothing to suggest this has been mentioned outside that Financial Times article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- It reads as if it was a conference or event about 10 years ago, which every one has now forgotten, so that it is presumably now NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.