Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Bar Crunch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete a redirect can be created if it's shown that this is a plausible search term, e.g. that a source shows people actually do call it by this name. W.marsh 18:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Diamond Bar Crunch
I can't find any sources that use this term. Note that if this is deleted the incoming links should be too. --NE2 07:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to either one of the subjective highway. Not an official name, though an interesting case study to keep on for the roads that constitute this stretch of freeway.  Which incoming links?  --Dennisthe2 09:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * These incoming links. --NE2 12:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Erm, no. If you want those deleted, nominate them separately. --71.216.9.26 17:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? You don't need to take an article to AFD to remove a link on it. --NE2 18:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ...sorry, misunderstood. Gotta concur, then, clean up the articles.  =O.o= --Dennisthe2 00:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect LazyDaisy 13:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The sources that use the term are the people that live in the area and have to drive on it every day to work. Leave the article alone; it's nice to know what you're getting into when you move to LA and people are using confusing terms for roads you've never heard. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.65.39.123 (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Yes, but a colloquialism is not inherently notable. The term Orange Crush became notable because of press - I'm not sure that this would quite qualify. --Dennisthe2 00:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:NEO we should not be popularizing a term that is not already in wide use. No evidence of use is provided here. Also the current article is completely unsourced. EdJohnston 06:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.