Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Days (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Diamond Days (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG, page creator appears to be band member promoting the project, first posting attempt (speedied) was a direct rip of their LinkedIn profile. At best looks like WP:TOO SOON. JamesG5 (talk) 17:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sources were not found that would likely make subject notable under either GNG or the additional criteria for musicians. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:36, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete due to no evidence of notability. RA 0808  talkcontribs 23:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. A band is not automatically entitled to keep an unsourced Wikipedia article just because they exist — reliable source coverage, verifying that they pass one or more criteria in WP:NMUSIC, must be present for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 03:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pretty clear this one doesn't meet WP:GNG/WP:MUSICBIO at this time. ERK  talk 04:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BAND, non-notable band. Arun Kumar SINGH  (Talk)  08:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.