Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete all.  jj137  ♠ 02:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is about non-notable mixtape by Trina. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N. Admc2006 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail notability:


 * Delete all, mixtapes are usually considered non-notable as they can't usually be sourced. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge all into Trina. Although it may be difficult to find a good source for the tracklisting, MTV seems to think that Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch and Rockstarr are notable enough to write about, and I see no reason why this content can't be accomidated in the artist's article. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 04:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mixtapes alone are not notable. Dlae  │  here  15:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all as non-notable crystalballing.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Since only Diamond Princess vs. Da Baddest Bitch hasn't been released yet, can you give your votes/justification for the other two mixtape articles? -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 16:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No third party sources on either unless anyone cares to prove otherwise.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Cheers, thanks. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 17:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I find it so funny that anytime I either add a page to WikiPedia or even edit a page, it gets deleted. I source, I clean it up, I do everything told to do, and it still doesn't cut it. Meanwhile, there are thousands of other pages that remain up that do not even have ONE sourced material.--FSX-2007 (talk) 05:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete They aren't really notable for an article, but if they're official, they can definitely be mentioned in her discography. Spellcast (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment So your vote is not delete, but rather merge? -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 21:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Pretty much. If they're official, they can at least be mentioned in the discography. Spellcast (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.