Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamonds Are Invincible


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Diamonds Are Invincible

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable release per WP:NSONGS >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 18:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. >>  Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 18:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 December 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)


 * List of sources found in a brief check of Google. Between all of these, I think it's worth a keep. QuietHere (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Disagree, if you look at the sources, coverage is not indepth and rarely strays beyond confirming the existence of the track/song. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 20:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NSONG with sources presented by QuietHere. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 03:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per QuietHere's sourcing. If this had been included on some sort of album, I could have potentially been persuaded on some sort of redirect/merge situation, as I don't see this evolving much out of stub status. But I don't see any great avenue for that. And that's fine. There's no policy against stubs. Sometimes they make the most sense. Sergecross73   msg me  17:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep because it passes WP:GNG with the sources found by QuietHere. TipsyElephant (talk) 04:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.