Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamonds under fire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Diamonds under fire

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not notable, only 1 contributer and said contributer is called Diamondsunderfire which leads me to believe it is a promotion account. Has been put up for speedy deletion before, but said contributer deleted notice. Said contributer is reported. -Vaarsivius (Talk to me.) 06:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This could be WP:COI, however, I can't find any blatant promotion in the article, it is written in a neutral way. Moreover, the article contains multiple reliable sources, which is in my opinion sufficient to meet notability requirements for bands (# 1). --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep recommended due to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. That said, I'm totally puzzled as to why the Facebook template is added to this article. Cindamuse (talk) 12:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.